Re: Simple Doubt regarding BGP

Got it..thnx experts....

raghav

On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 7:06 PM, Bryan Bartik <bbartik_at_ipexpert.com> wrote:

> Hi Raghav,
>
> When you configure the loopback of 2.2.2./8 the connected route is
> actually 2.0.0.0/8. This is what you need advertised in your BGP
> configuration. Now suppose you had 2.2.2.2/32, then you would need
> "network 2.2.2.2 mask 255.255.255.255".
>
>
> Bryan Bartik
> CCIE #23707, CCNP
> Sr. Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc.
> URL: http://www.IPexpert.com
>
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 7:55 PM, Raghav Bhargava <
> raghavbhargava12_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Experts,
>>
>> Very basic question
>>
>> Suppose I have this ip address configured on my loopback Interface of R1
>>
>> 2.2.2.2/8
>>
>> Now under my BGP Process if i advertise this network as
>>
>>
>> network 2.2.2.2
>>
>> OR
>>
>> network 2.0.0.0
>>
>> Now in first case I don't see this network in the BGP table of the other
>> router but
>> if I follow the second case the network is seen.
>>
>> Can anyone please explain why is it doing like this??
>>
>> --
>> Warm Regards
>> Raghav
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
>

-- 
Warm Regards
Raghav
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net