Well, as Darby pointed out for us, there is nothing to fear here.
Please keep that in mind as you walk in the center.
You will receive 4 questions - do not miss more than one, and then
begin your configuration section. Your strategy for the configuration
section can be identical in form as it was prior to the introduction
of the Core Knowledge section.
I just realized I have typed the words Core Knowledge about 23,452
times in the last month. :-)
On Apr 24, 2009, at 2:38 PM, Asif Gul Khan wrote:
> How about trying to get an Official Cisco verdict on this rather
> than individually chasing the guys who took the lab...specially when
> everyone have diffrent opinions).... what i feel is if cisco doesi
> nform students about oeq points during/b4 that section, than they
> will have no objection in making it public....i mean whats the point
> in hiding section scores( oeq n lab part)....its not lyk a student
> preparing for the exam can cheat or something lyk dat...BUT he can
> prepare in a better way with a better understanding....rather than a
> student entering the centre with a fear in his mind....
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 12:00 AM, Darby Weaver
> <ccie.weaver_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Since I wrote this - I've gotten a few more people who state this very
> explicitly and still some who say what I wrote mirrored their
> experience.
>
> I find the disparity of conflicting information - interesting.
>
> Small matter either way - Fail the OEQ - Fail the Lab. Whether
> explicit or
> implicit it still comes out to effectually 21 points.
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Anthony Sequeira <
> asequeira_at_internetworkexpert.com> wrote:
>
> > I was told by a proctor it is 21 points for the Core Knowledge
> section
> > (graded pass/fail as we have posted about many times) and then 79
> points in
> > the configuration section.
> >
> > A student confirmed this for me and also indicated that the tasks
> are all 2
> > or 3 points in value now. Obviously, if you have taken the exam
> recently and
> > experienced anything that conflicts with this information, please
> let us
> > know. :-)
> >
> > Warmest Regards,
> >
> > Anthony J. Sequeira, CCIE #15626
> > Senior CCIE Instructor
> > http://www.InternetworkExpert.com <http://www.internetworkexpert.com/
> >
> >
> > Internetwork Expert, Inc.
> > Toll Free: 877-224-8987
> > Outside US: 775-826-4344
> >
> > Test your Core Knowledge today!
> > Q: In the BGP best path selection process, which origin code is most
> > preferable?
> > A: IGP
> > More Info:
> > http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk365/technologies_tech_note09186a0080094431.shtml
> >
> >
> > On Apr 24, 2009, at 9:26 AM, Darby Weaver wrote:
> >
> > That's a good question - I did go back to my lists of people who
> passed
> >> and
> >> posed the questions.
> >>
> >> Perhaps there were two methods of scoring.
> >>
> >> The funny part is only one person said 21/79.
> >>
> >> The rest said no point values for the oeq. They were just asked to
> >> complete
> >> the questions and it was stressed how important it was.
> >>
> >> I did lean toward recent takers.
> >>
> >> I had a hard time swallowing the 21/79 - it just is not conistent
> with my
> >> own lab experiences to be able to nail 21 points (by most
> accounts "easy")
> >> in 20 minutes. However for everyone who passes, they would say the
> >> questions I missed in my own labs were easy too.
> >>
> >> The funny thing is hindsight is 20/20 and I tend to agree with
> them - I
> >> missed some easy stuff... Grumble Grumble - It all comes down to
> prep and
> >> sleep.
> >>
> >>
> >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >>
> >>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> >> Subscription information may be found at:
> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Fri Apr 24 2009 - 14:59:35 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon May 04 2009 - 07:39:12 ART