Re: OT: Rumor Control: Major CCIE RS Changes - Do or Do Not

Scott - you are an international man of mystery :-)

Larry Hadrava
CCIE #12203 CCNP CCNA
Sr. Support Engineer  IPexpert, Inc.
URL: http://www.IPexpert.com

On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Scott Morris <
smorris_at_internetworkexpert.com> wrote:

> I'm in the process of changing e-mail clients.... I keep forgetting to
> change the send-as part for GS rules.
>
> Outlook pissed me off one too many times, so I'm working with
> Thunderbird at the moment.
>
> So nothing's missing, just a brain-fart on my end! (Happens when you
> get old!)
>
> Scott
>
>
> Dark Fiber wrote:
> > Scott,
> > What happened with your INE stuff in your emails?!?!?!?!
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Scott Morris" <swm_at_emanon.com>
> > To: "Darby Weaver" <ccie.weaver_at_gmail.com>
> > Cc: "Cisco certification" <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 1:06:07 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
> > Subject: Re: OT: Rumor Control: Major CCIE RS Changes - Do or Do Not Book
> Your Lab
> >
> > Darby - The sky isn't falling.
> >
> > Every program goes through rearrangements. Some places are more public
> > about it than others. Sometimes rumors get out of control.
> >
> > Either way, they are fun to watch.
> >
> > Whatever anyone's perception of changes (if any) happen to be, the best
> > thing to do is ask yourself "Does this make sense?". Not whether you
> > agree with something or
> > not (e.g. the core technology questions), but asking whether it makes
> sense.
> >
> > Some of the rumors I hear about make me laugh, because they don't pass a
> > simple "sanity check". Either way though, no matter what level of
> > change, 5%, 10%, 30%, 80% shouldn't make any difference right here,
> > right now.
> >
> > And as for a method to wipe the other vendors off the map, that by
> > itself doesn't pass the sanity check. By any stretch of the imagination
> > (e.g. even if they really wanted to), smaller companies are inherently
> > more nimble than larger ones. So any of us have a much better chance of
> > doing just fine with any perceived changes in the program.
> >
> > The only thing that may change would be more a concern for Brad
> > (CCBootcamp) than the rest of us. Trying to split hairs between Cisco
> > Learning Partner and offering grey-market materials is going to become
> > harder and harder. But that isn't my concern! :)
> >
> > Relax, sit back, and enjoy the ride! Rumors != Reality.
> >
> > Scott
> >
> >
> > Darby Weaver wrote:
> >
> >> Ok - Fresh off the press.
> >>
> >> Cisco is getting ready to announce a major shift in the Cisco 360
> Program.
> >>
> >> Some say is it posed to wipe the "Grey Market Vendors" off the map in
> favor
> >> of the "Evil" Cisco 360 Program.
> >>
> >>
> >> Well - Maybe it's an April Fool's Joke...
> >>
> >> Maybe it is true.
> >>
> >> Either way - Be afraid...
> >>
> >> I think the Cisco 360 was not working out as well...
> >>
> >> Give me your born for 6-12 month subscription was a load of BS..
> >>
> >> Compared to the competition....
> >>
> >> Hmm?
> >>
> >> And the rumor further says.... The Cisco 360 Program is withdrawn...
> >>
> >> Going to check now.
> >>
> >> This is hot as horse-shit!
> >>
> >> Take it for what is worth.
> >>
> >>
> >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________________________________
> >> Subscription information may be found at:
> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >>
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Apr 23 2009 - 14:12:32 ART