Re: IP SLA Monitor

Thanks a lot, I never implemented it before, therefore, like to verify
before using it.

On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 4:34 PM, David Prall <dcp_at_dcptech.com> wrote:

> I'd say minimal. I have 10 tracked objects, using 6 ip sla's, with 4 EEM
> Applet's, and 1 static route using EOT.
>
> #sh proc cpu | i SLA
> 221 17320 2227937 7 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 IP SLAs Event
> Pr
>
> #sh proc 221
> Process ID 221 [IP SLAs Event Processor], TTY 0
> Memory usage [in bytes]
> Holding: 17208, Maximum: 48332, Allocated: 42236, Freed: 6328
> Getbufs: 0, Retbufs: 0, Stack: 2668/6000
> CPU usage
> PC: 8148B528, Invoked: 2227938, Giveups: 1993513, uSec: 7
> 5Sec: 0.00%, 1Min: 0.00%, 5Min: 0.00%, Average: 0.00%
> Age: 7864535564 msec, Runtime: 17320 msec
> State: Waiting for Event, Priority: Normal
>
> #sh proc cpu | i Track
> 92 0 2 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 IP Host Track
> Pr
> 174 0 3 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 EEM ED Track
> 206 5880 9934593 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Track
>
> #sh proc 92
> Process ID 92 [IP Host Track Process], TTY 0
> Memory usage [in bytes]
> Holding: 10244, Maximum: 10496, Allocated: 252, Freed: 252
> Getbufs: 0, Retbufs: 0, Stack: 8576/9000
> CPU usage
> PC: 818FC84C, Invoked: 2, Giveups: 0, uSec: 0
> 5Sec: 0.00%, 1Min: 0.00%, 5Min: 0.00%, Average: 0.00%
> Age: 7864659936 msec, Runtime: 0 msec
> State: Waiting for Event, Priority: Normal
>
> #sh proc 174
> Process ID 174 [EEM ED Track], TTY 0
> Memory usage [in bytes]
> Holding: 13976, Maximum: 13976, Allocated: 3732, Freed: 0
> Getbufs: 0, Retbufs: 0, Stack: 8332/9000
> CPU usage
> PC: 80A85968, Invoked: 3, Giveups: 1, uSec: 0
> 5Sec: 0.00%, 1Min: 0.00%, 5Min: 0.00%, Average: 0.00%
> Age: 7864632804 msec, Runtime: 0 msec
> State: Waiting for Event, Priority: Normal
>
> #sh proc 206
> Process ID 206 [Track], TTY 0
> Memory usage [in bytes]
> Holding: 7696, Maximum: 42784, Allocated: 690736, Freed: 61972
> Getbufs: 0, Retbufs: 0, Stack: 3216/6000
> CPU usage
> PC: 816C8614, Invoked: 9934668, Giveups: 0, uSec: 0
> 5Sec: 0.00%, 1Min: 0.00%, 5Min: 0.00%, Average: 0.00%
> Age: 7864634104 msec, Runtime: 5880 msec
> State: Waiting for Event, Priority: Normal
>
> --
> http://dcp.dcptech.com
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> > S Malik
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 4:01 PM
> > To: Cisco certification
> > Subject: IP SLA Monitor
> >
> > Is there any impact of "ip sla monitor" on CPU?
> >
> > I need to configure some static routes across an EVPL circuit,
> > therefore I
> > like to verify end-to-end connectivity.
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Tue Apr 21 2009 - 16:52:39 ART