Re: A secure port cannot be a protected port

Jared,
Table refers Private-vlans not protected ports, therefore, 3550 of course
is not supported, however, I like to use 3550 with protected port and port
security together. Thanks for your time.

On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 9:27 AM, Jared Scrivener <jscrivener_at_ipexpert.com>wrote:

> Support for port security on private vlans on private vlan interfaces on
> the
> 3560 switch was added in 12.2(37)SE.
>
>
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/iosswrel/ps8802/ps6969/ps5012/ps7
> 347/prod_bulletin0900aecd8064772c.html
>
> Cheers,
>
> Jared Scrivener CCIE3 #16983 (R&S, Security, SP), CISSP
> Sr. Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
> Fax: +1.810.454.0130
> Mailto: jscrivener_at_ipexpert.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Carlos G Mendioroz
> Sent: Sunday, 19 April 2009 7:49 AM
> To: S Malik
> Cc: Ryan West; Cisco certification
> Subject: Re: A secure port cannot be a protected port
>
> I guess this (the doc being wrong) might come from some architectures
> not being able to handle both fns at once.
> Don't assume that because it works in one, it works everywhere.
> It might even depend on IOS version...
>
> -Carlos
>
> S Malik @ 19/04/2009 2:05 -0200 dixit:
> > As per table, secure port & protected are compatible. Thanks for the
> > reference and to every one for taking time to answer my question.
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 12:39 AM, Ryan West <rwest_at_zyedge.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Malik,
> >>
> >> I don't think you should have any problem configuring it. I wasn't able
> to
> >> find the text you're referring to, but I was able to find this table for
> >> 12.2(25)SEB and 12.2(44)SE:
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst3550/software/release/1
> 2.2_44_se/configuration/guide/swtrafc.html#wp1184775
> >>
> >> -ryan
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> S
> >> Malik
> >> Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2009 9:15 PM
> >> To: Cisco certification
> >> Subject: A secure port cannot be a protected port
> >>
> >> As per Cisco's documentation "A secure port cannot be a protected port",
> >> However, I could configure port-security & switchport protected on an
> >> interface on 3550 switch.
> >>
> >> Can any explain please?
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> Malik
> >>
> >>
> >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________________________________
> >> Subscription information may be found at:
> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Carlos G Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar> LW7 EQI Argentina
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sun Apr 19 2009 - 09:42:14 ART