RE: Regarding Offset list in EIGRP

From: Jared Scrivener <jscrivener_at_ipexpert.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 08:50:07 -0400

Yep, it works like with RIP - it adds the offset stated in the offset-list
to the current metric when it either sends or receives the update.

Cheers,
 
Jared Scrivener CCIE3 #16983 (R&S, Security, SP), CISSP
Sr. Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
Mailto: jscrivener_at_ipexpert.com

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Divin Mathew John
Sent: Friday, 17 April 2009 3:41 AM
To: Dale Shaw
Cc: Raghav Bhargava; Cisco certification
Subject: Re: Regarding Offset list in EIGRP

I think it works just as RIP offset list. Add or Substract the metric.!

"The EIGRP topology table reflects the increase in delay from R4 (10.1.2.4).

R4 feasible distance (281600) + R4 offset-list (20) = R4 reported
distance (281620). "

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk365/technologies_tech_note09186a00800c2d96
.shtml#modifycompositemetric

Thanking You

Yours Sincerely

Divin Mathew John
divinjohn_at_gmail.com
divin_at_dide3d.com
http://www.dide3d.com
+91 9945430983
+91 9846697191
+974 5008916
PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK @ http://www.dide3d.com/divin_Public_PGP_key.txt

On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 7:23 AM, Dale Shaw <dale.shaw_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> The value specified in the offset-list command applies to the _delay_
> component of the composite metric.
>
> cheers,
> Dale
>
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Raghav Bhargava
> <raghavbhargava12_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Experts,
>>
>> When we use Offset list in Eigrp, it reflects what???
>>
>> I mean like in RIP when we use Offset list it is used for increasing the
hop
>> counts for a specific route.
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Fri Apr 17 2009 - 08:50:07 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon May 04 2009 - 07:39:12 ART