Re: Disabling spanning tree

the question as it's I didn't change anything

portfast won't disable spanning tree even with bpdufilter !

but still is it right ""no switchport""?!!!! there is no way other than
this?!!

On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 11:32 PM, Jonathan Greenwood II
<gwood83_at_gmail.com>wrote:

> I'm just curious to see if with it enabled on the interface if the port
> still comes up as FWD under the sh spann-tree. If it comes up as Desg/FWD
> then I would have to scratch my head, because it still says STP is
> operational based upon the port moving into the Forwarding state. Looks
> like Ryan just posted the output and it shows STP is still enabled. Any
> thoughts??? To be safe I guess I'm still going to go with "no switchport"
> Thanks Ryan for the output.
>
> Jonathan Greenwood II
> CCIE #22744
>
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 1:23 PM, loopback 99 <loopback99_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > I think they are looking for BPDU Filter at the interface level. The
> Cisco
> > documentation says this about it: 'Caution Enabling BPDU filtering on
> an
> > interface is the same as disabling spanning tree on it and can result in
> > spanning-tree loops.'
> >
> > L.
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Jonathan Greenwood II
> CCIE #22744
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Apr 16 2009 - 23:45:49 ART