Re: Mpls vs mpls lite

From: Nadeem Ansari <nadeem.ansari574_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 20:27:39 +0530

very simle and good explanation of VRF-Lite done by Pavel..

VRF + MP-BGP(if BGP used in VRF) - MPLS = VRF-LITE

Regards
Nadeem

On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Pavel Bykov <slidersv_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Uh.. I think you mean VRF-lite, not MPLS lite.
>
> Normally, you need MPLS for VPNs to communicate, with MP-BGP governing the
> transmission and telling MPLS what it needs.
>
> But sometimes, you just need VPNs without MPLS and MP-BGP at all. Just
> completely separate networks locally on a router. Then you would create
> VRFs
> with RDs, but without MPLS or RTs! So you have VRF, but only locally on a
> router. This is called VRF-lite.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 9:01 AM, <mark.chandra_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Guys,
> >
> > Anybody know a good source of technical document about the difference
> > between mpls and mpls lite ?
> >
> > Thanks guys
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Mark
> > Sent from my BlackBerry. wireless device from XL GPRS/EDGE/3G network
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Pavel Bykov
> ----------------
> Don't forget to help stopping the braindumps, use of which reduces value of
> your certifications. Sign the petition at http://www.stopbraindumps.com/
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Apr 16 2009 - 20:27:39 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon May 04 2009 - 07:39:12 ART