Re: Frame-Relay

From: Thameem Maranveetil Parambath <tparamba_at_thecontactcentre.ae>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 12:57:07 +0400

What about assigning IP to the main interface and enc frame should do a
dynamic Inarp...

you shud be able to see the maping from sh frame map

Regards
Thameem

michael haynes <mghaynes_at_gmail.com>
Sent by: nobody_at_groupstudy.com
14/04/2009 10:21 PM
Please respond to
michael haynes <mghaynes_at_gmail.com>

To
Paul Adams <ccie.paul_at_gmail.com>
cc
Tharak Abraham <tharakabraham_at_gmail.com>, "Tony Schaffran (GS)"
<groupstudy_at_cconlinelabs.com>, Cisco certification
<ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
Subject
Re: Frame-Relay

If your LMI is communicating with the switch correctly, you'll be able to
see what DLCIs are available via the 'show frame-relay pvc' command. If
you
are configuring back to back, you won't have LMI so you can pretty much
make
up your own DLCI numbers at that point.

I would say for the lab that if you got into a situation where no DLCI was
given, pull up the DLCI list you get from the switch, and ask the proctor
if
it makes a difference which one you use. If the switch is sending you 3
DLCI numbers, it probably isn't going to matter which one you choose.

Michael

On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 2:04 PM, Paul Adams <ccie.paul_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Thank you.
>
> Simple frame-relay setup was not working, and my gut feeling was that
> solution applied was Corrrect.
> Later after applying "Frame-relay lmi-type cisco" it started showing
active
> and working.
>
> I could get into same issue at LAB Exams.
>
> Normally DLCI are giving in Exam, what if not given, how could someone
> identify the DLCI if not given.
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Tharak Abraham <tharakabraham_at_gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Paul,
> >
> > * you might've been asking about the frame relay encapsulation types
> which
> > could be IETF or the default encap ? For this, i think it should be
> > default unless specified.
> >
> > * lmi-type would be be also specified or hinted what to be used for,
or
> we
> > could enable the debug frame-relay lmi and find it?
> >
> > (If no clue, the trial and error method + debugs maybe the last
resort)
> >
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Tharak Abraham.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Tony Schaffran (GS) <
> > groupstudy_at_cconlinelabs.com> wrote:
> >
> >> IETF and lmi-type cisco are not one or the other.
> >>
> >> I think you may be referring to lmi-type ansi or lmi-type cisco?
> >>
> >> If so, the default is cisco.
> >>
> >> More times than not, the setting will be cisco unless specified.
> >>
> >>
> >> Tony Schaffran
> >> Sr. Network Consultant
> >> CCIE #11071
> >> CCNP, CCNA, CCDA,
> >> NNCDS, NNCSS, CNE, MCSE
> >>
> >> www.cconlinelabs.com
> >> Your #1 choice for online Cisco rack rentals.
> >>
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf
Of
> >> Paul
> >> Adams
> >> Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 6:54 AM
> >> To: Cisco certification
> >> Subject: Frame-Relay
> >>
> >> Hi GS,
> >>
> >> Since we dont have access to Frame-relay Switch. How could we know if
> the
> >> frame-relay switch interface is configured with
> >> either frame-relay IETF or frame-relay lmi-type cisco.
> >>
> >>
> >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >>
> >>
Received on Thu Apr 16 2009 - 12:57:07 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon May 04 2009 - 07:39:12 ART