Thanks George, I did read that after I posted :)
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 2:33 PM, George Roman <georgeroman_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Bryan you quoted the wrong thing ;) That one is referring to the case when
> you are dealing with two Type 7 LSA
>
> Here is the correct quote from the RFC:
> "
>
> If the current LSA is functionally the same as an
>
> installed LSA (i.e., same destination, cost and non-zero
> forwarding address) then apply the following priorities in
>
> deciding which LSA is preferred:
>
> 1. A Type-7 LSA with the P-bit set.
>
>
> 2. A Type-5 LSA.
>
> 3. The LSA with the higher router ID.
>
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 1:10 AM, Bryan Bartik <bbartik_at_ipexpert.com>wrote:
>
>> Yep, I see now that RFC 3031 says "An LSA with the P-bit set is preferred
>> over one with the P-bit" and if the P-bit settings are equal, the highest
>> router-id is preferred.
>>
>>
>>
>
-- Bryan Bartik CCIE #23707, CCNP Sr. Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc. URL: http://www.IPexpert.com Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.netReceived on Wed Apr 15 2009 - 17:33:33 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon May 04 2009 - 07:39:12 ART