Re: QoS interpretation

Thank you for you help. I see why shaping is used in this question now. :)

Nick

2009/4/15 Gabriel <mail.to.gabriel_at_gmail.com>

> You police as the provider, you shape as the customer. In these
> examples, you are the customer and the owner of BBn is the provider,
> so he is policing and you should shape.
>
> If you think about it, it makes sense this way: if you're the
> provider, you don't care what happens to the customer's excess
> traffic: you promised the customer X mbps and that's all he gets. If
> you're the customer with a policed pipe, you want to do the best you
> can to make good use of that X mbps for your most important traffic,
> so you shape to fit the rate that's being policed by the provider.
>
> -Gabriel
>
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 6:24 PM, Nick <ccieaz_at_googlemail.com> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I still have trouble sometimes with QoS question interpretation.
> >
> > Take this example from IE lab 18
> >
> > ".... BB2 will only allow R5 to send traffic across this link at a
> maximum
> > of 2.5mpbs. BB3 will only allow R5 to send traffic into its network at a
> > maximum rate of 3mpbs"
> >
> > How should I interpret this?
> >
> > I think that you could do this with shaping, policing or bandwidth
> > statement. But which is best and why?
> >
> > Any tips would be great.
> >
> > (SG uses shaping)
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Nick
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Wed Apr 15 2009 - 02:49:14 ART