maybe.! just tell us wht ur solution would be in multiarea OSPF!
Thanking You
Yours Sincerely
Divin Mathew John
divinjohn_at_gmail.com
divin_at_dide3d.com
http://www.dide3d.com
+91 9945430983
+91 9846697191
+974 5008916
PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK @ http://www.dide3d.com/divin_Public_PGP_key.txt
Sent from Bangalore, KA, India
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 2:43 AM, Paul Cosgrove <paul.cosgrove_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> In this scenario are you allowed to use two different OSPF processes on R4?
>
> Paul.
>
> Divin Mathew John wrote:
>>
>> i have the following Scenario.
>>
>> R2<-----R4---->R3
>> |
>> |
>> R1
>>
>> now.. R4 is running OSPF and EIGRP . Redistributing mutually. R2 and
>> R3 are getting all the routes. R2 and R3 runnning OSPF. R1 is running
>> EIGRP.
>> Now say ... R1 has 6.6.0.0/24 in its routing table. While
>> redistributing at R4 i dont want the 6.6.0.0/24 to be advertised to R3
>> but R2 shud be able to reach the 6.6.0.0/24. I know that u can use a
>> distribute list in on R3 and filter the routes. but can something be
>> done on R4 to make 6.6.0.0 filtered towards R3 and not towards R2.
>>
>>
>> Thanking You
>>
>> Yours Sincerely
>>
>> Divin Mathew John
>> divinjohn_at_gmail.com
>> divin_at_dide3d.com
>> http://www.dide3d.com
>> +91 9945430983
>> +91 9846697191
>> +974 5008916
>> PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK @ http://www.dide3d.com/divin_Public_PGP_key.txt
>> Sent from Bangalore, KA, India
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Tue Apr 14 2009 - 02:48:01 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon May 04 2009 - 07:39:11 ART