Re: MQC shape vs peak command confusion

Mr Petr wrote a great article about the shape peak command:

http://blog.internetworkexpert.com/2008/08/26/understanding-the-shape-peak-command/

On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 6:27 AM, naveen M S <navin.ms_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Group,
>
> Here is my task :
>
> 1) Shape HTTP traffic to a peak rate of 128kbps sent out to Vlan 34.
> 2) Use Bc and Be bursts based on 10ms interval.
>
> *My solution was -*
>
> class-map HTTP
> match protocol http
> policy-map SHAPE
> class HTTP
> * shape peak 128000 1280 0*
> interface gig 0/0
> service-policy output SHAPE
>
> Rack1R1(config-pmap-c)#* do sh policy-map int gig0/0*
> Target/Average Byte Sustain Excess Interval Increment
> Rate Limit bits/int bits/int (ms) (bytes)
> 128000/128000 160 1280 0 10 160
>
> *The workbook solution was -*
>
> class-map HTTP
> match protocol http
> policy-map SHAPE
> class HTTP
> * shape peak 64000 6400 6400*
> interface gig 0/0
> service-policy output SHAPE
>
> Rack1R1(config-pmap-c)# *do sh policy-map int gig0/0*
> Target/Average Byte Sustain Excess Interval Increment
> Rate Limit bits/int bits/int (ms) (bytes)
> 128000/64000 1600 6400 6400 100 1600
>
> What difference it makes to the peak output rate when either of the 2
> statements are given ?
>
> 1) shape peak 128000 1280
> 2) shape peak 64000 6400 6400
>
> Thanks,
> Naveen.
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
<ruhann>
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net