I think destination Port would be more APT.! becoz to connect to a normal
HTTP webserver u wud use port 80 to connect to web server and not
necessarily POrt 80 on your comp.!
Thanking You
Yours Sincerely
Divin Mathew John
divinjohn_at_gmail.com
divin_at_dide3d.com
+91 9945430983
+91 9846697191
+974 5008916
PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK @ http://www.dide3d.com/divin_Public_PGP_key.txt
Sent from Bangalore, KA, India
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 11:44 PM, naveen M S <navin.ms_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Group,
>
> I have trouble translating these statements to ACLs.
>
> 1) All HTTP traffic coming from Vlan 34.
> 2) All HTTP traffic coming from R1 on Vlan 34.
> 3) All HTTP traffic coming from Web Server on Vlan 34.
> 4) All HTTP traffic going out to Vlan 34.
> 5) All HTTP traffic going out to Web Server on Vlan 34.
>
> *Question is:*
> Should I match both Source and Destination TCP port to 80 (or) just one of
> them ?
> Assume Vlan 34 = 10.1.34.0/24, R1 = 10.1.34.1/24, WebServer =
> 10.1.34.100/24
>
> My solutions is for the above are:
>
> a) Match source tcp port = 80 for incoming HTTP traffic
> b) Match destination tcp port = 80 for outgoing HTTP traffic.
>
> 1) ip access-list extended V34_in
> permit tcp 10.1.34.0 0.0.0.255 eq www any
>
> 2) ip access-list extended V34_R1_in
> permit tcp 10.1.34.1 0.0.0.0 eq www any
>
> 3) ip access-list extended V34_WS_in
> permit tcp 10.1.30.100 0.0.0.0 eq www any
>
> 4) ip access-list extended V34_out
> permit tcp any 10.1.30.0 0.0.0.255 eq www
>
> 5) ip access-list extended V34_WS_out
> permit tcp any 10.1.30.100 0.0.0.0 eq www
>
> Can someone please highlight the Source & Destination TCP ports for HTTP
> traffic in both directions ?
>
> Thanks very much,
> Naveen.
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Apr 02 2009 - 23:49:39 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon May 04 2009 - 07:39:11 ART