RE:

Do not use the "no auto-summary" command under the Rip process,

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Cisco Fanatic
Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 7:42 AM
To: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
Subject:

I have RIPv2 running between R4 and BB2 and other parts of the network.
- BB2 are getting the routes. Fine.
- Now I only need a summarized route to BB2. Don't use summary-address
command.
- Ok, I used distribute-list.
- The command looks ok to me, but after applying the command I don't see
any routes.

BB2#si rip
     163.1.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 6 subnets, 2 masks
R 163.1.35.0/24 [120/2] via 192.10.1.4, 00:00:12, Ethernet0/0
R 163.1.45.0/24 [120/1] via 192.10.1.4, 00:00:12, Ethernet0/0
R 163.1.54.0/24 [120/1] via 192.10.1.4, 00:00:12, Ethernet0/0
R 163.1.57.0/24 [120/2] via 192.10.1.4, 00:00:12, Ethernet0/0
R 163.1.0.0/26 [120/3] via 192.10.1.4, 00:00:12, Ethernet0/0
R 163.1.7.0/24 [120/3] via 192.10.1.4, 00:00:12, Ethernet0/0
     150.1.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
R 150.1.7.0 [120/3] via 192.10.1.4, 00:00:12, Ethernet0/0
R* 0.0.0.0/0 [120/2] via 192.10.1.4, 00:00:12, Ethernet0/0

R4
++
!
router rip
 version 2
 passive-interface default
 no passive-interface Serial0/1
 no passive-interface Ethernet1/0
 network 163.1.0.0
 network 192.10.1.0
 distribute-list prefix RIP_SUMMARY out Ethernet1/0 no auto-summary !
ip prefix-list RIP_SUMMARY seq 5 permit 163.1.0.0/18 !

BB2#si rip

-Yuri
Received on Thu Apr 02 2009 - 07:45:31 ART