RE: QOS - RTP

I would go for the first one adding "audio"
I mean "match protocol rtp audio"

HTH

Santiago E

-----Mensaje original-----
De: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] En nombre de Ruhann
Enviado el: Miircoles, 01 de Abril de 2009 01:32 p.m.
Para: Cisco certification
Asunto: QOS - RTP

Hi Guys

Just a quick one regarding classifying "VOIP" traffic.

If the question just state prioritize VOIP traffic, without any
specification or limitation,
would both solutions be valid?

1.
class-map match-all VOIP1
 match protocol rtp

2.
access 169 per udp any any range 16384 32767
class-map match-all VOIP2
 match access-group 169

With the first option, the packets are classified as RTP based on multiple
attributes in the RTP header, rather than even UDP port numbers alone.

Would both be correct if the LAB?

Please be so kind to advise
Regards

-- 
<ruhann>
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net