Re: Rip Question

From: Narbik Kocharians (narbikk@gmail.com)
Date: Wed Mar 25 2009 - 23:35:00 ART

Yes you should consider the transparent option, its NOT when you
redistribute the RIP routes into BGP, its when you redistribute them back to
RIp on the other end.

On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 1:10 PM, Scott M Vermillion <
scott_ccie_list@it-ag.com> wrote:

> Thus far I have personally been going with the 'transparent' metric option.
> Obviously you want to look to ensure that doesn't result in anything being
> advertised as unreachable.
>
> Mind you, I haven't been to the SP lab and I haven't gotten terribly far
> into my preparations for it, so I may yet find some reason to change my
> approach. FWIW...
>
>
> On Mar 25, 2009, at 10:31 , CCIESP wrote:
>
> Hi All
>>
>> When redistributing RIP into BGP VRF address family for example is it
>> best practice to specify a metric ? I have always just done the redist
>> rip command but i am now wondering if it isnt better to add a metric
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 

-- 
Narbik Kocharians
CCSI#30832, CCIE# 12410 (R&S, SP, Security)
www.MicronicsTraining.com
www.Net-Workbooks.com
Sr. Technical Instructor

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Apr 06 2009 - 06:44:07 ART