From: Tharak Abraham (tharakabraham@gmail.com)
Date: Wed Mar 25 2009 - 13:38:56 ART
It can/may be reasoned as the router telling that its allowed to
redistribute route or maybe on an assumption that redistribution is configured
!
BR,
Tharak.
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 4:19 PM, CCIESummit <cciesummit@gmail.com> wrote:
> Anyone know why or what the reasoning behind eigrp saying it is
> redistributing a process, when infact no redistribution config exists under
> the eigrp process? This could be a topic for discussion on an open-ended
> question if anything =)
>
> Routing Protocol is "eigrp 200"
> Outgoing update filter list for all interfaces is not set
> Incoming update filter list for all interfaces is not set
> Default networks flagged in outgoing updates
> Default networks accepted from incoming updates
> EIGRP metric weight K1=0, K2=0, K3=1, K4=0, K5=0
> EIGRP maximum hopcount 100
> EIGRP maximum metric variance 1
> *Redistributing: eigrp 200*
> EIGRP NSF-aware route hold timer is 240s
> Automatic network summarization is not in effect
> Maximum path: 4
> Routing for Networks:
> 131.1.112.0/24
> 150.1.112.0/24
> Routing Information Sources:
> Gateway Distance Last Update
> Distance: internal 90 external 170
>
> BB2# sh run | sec eigrp
> router eigrp 200
> network 131.1.112.0 0.0.0.255
> network 150.1.112.0 0.0.0.255
> metric weights 0 0 0 1 0 0
> no auto-summary
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Apr 06 2009 - 06:44:07 ART