From: dschulz@skyline-ats.com
Date: Sun Mar 22 2009 - 23:27:06 ART
I thought that this required a carrier class router (based on the IOS
version) to support multicast in the vrf. Configuring this, I have seen
it come up with the mroute properly, but not pass the multicast traffic.
Have you been able to make this operational, and if so, what IOS level?
Dave
> Hi Peter,
>
> Is the mdt tunnel is up for the remote site ?
> can you see the remote vrf as the pim nei through mdt tunnel ?
> Once the mdt tunnel is up, and if the ce, remote ce, and the respective pe
> vrf's knows the RP you should be good to go..
>
>
> Thanks
> AbuFareed
>
> ==============================================
> Collaborative Learning Creates a Synergy of Knowledge !!
> http://www.networkplatform.com
>
>
>
>
> Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 02:01:14 -0700
> From: doubleccie@yahoo.com
> Subject: RE: Multicast VPN
> To: o.neghina@gmail.com; scott_ccie_list@it-ag.com;
> ahamed_maideen@hotmail.com
> CC: ccielab@groupstudy.com; roman@iementor.com
>
> Hi ,
> I faced the same issue before and that command was the solution , the MDT
> tunnel is not intiated from the loopback address and this command forces
> to
> do that .
>
>
>
> I have another question for the same topology , in brief when i have two
> VPN
> sites and MDT tunnel running between them ..on one site i have RP and the
> other site i have multicast source (just pinging ).., when i try to issue
> ping
> command to multicast address from the VRF interface , i do not get reply
> ...or
> i get reply once in while , while if the ping is intiated from the remote
> interface (the CE) of the same subnet i get normal reply ....is there any
> explanation for that ..is this normal behavior ?
>
> thanks in advance
>
>
>
>
> --- On Sat, 3/21/09, Abu Fareed <ahamed_maideen@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: Abu Fareed <ahamed_maideen@hotmail.com>
> Subject: RE: Multicast VPN
> To: o.neghina@gmail.com, scott_ccie_list@it-ag.com
> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com, roman@iementor.com
> Date: Saturday, March 21, 2009, 9:39 PM
>
> Thanks guys for all your help..
> It really worked..
>
> Regards,
> AbuFareed
>
> ==============================================
> Collaborative Learning Creates a Synergy of Knowledge !!
> http://www.networkplatform.com
>
>
>
>
>> Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2009 21:11:35 +0200
>> Subject: Re: Multicast VPN
>> From: o.neghina@gmail.com
>> To: scott_ccie_list@it-ag.com
>> CC: ahamed_maideen@hotmail.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
>>
>> Sometimes it helps to do configure
>> Router(config)# ip vrf RED
>> Router(config-vrf)# bgp next-hop loopback 0
>>
> http://cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/mpls/command/reference/mp_a1.html#wp1011653
>> Usage Guidelines
>> The bgp next-hop command is used in Multiprotocol Label Switching
>> (MPLS) Virtual Private Network (VPN) and Tunnel Engineering (TE)
>> configurations. This command allows you to configure a loopback
>> interface as the next hop for routes that are associated with the
>> specified VRF. This command can be used, for example, to configure VPN
>> traffic to use a specific Label Switched Path (LSP) through an MPLS
>> core network.
>>
>> ovidiu
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 11:33 PM, Scott M Vermillion
>> <scott_ccie_list@it-ag.com> wrote:
>> > Do you have PIM enabled on the loopback interfaces for the tunnel?
>> >
>> > On Mar 20, 2009, at 2:00 , Abu Fareed wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi Experts,
>> >>
>> >> I am seeing the the following error message while creating MDT
> tunnel.
>> >> I am using source loopback address in my BGP exchange, but still
> I am
>> >> seeing
>> >> this error that MDT tunnel uses Null0 source address 0.0.0.0
>> >>
>> >> Any Insights here ?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> 00:11:34: %MDT-4-LBSRC: VRF site2: MDT Null0 uses source address
> 0.0.0.0
>> >> from
>> >> a non-loopback interface
>> >> 00:11:35: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface
> Tunnel0,
> changed
>> >> state to down
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Thanks
>> >> AbuFareed
>> >> ==============================================
>> >> Collaborative Learning Creates a Synergy of Knowledge !!
>> >> http://www.networkplatform.com
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> _________________________________________________________________
>> >> The new Windows Live Messenger. You don t want to miss this.
>> >> http://www.microsoft.com/india/windows/windowslive/messenger.aspx
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>> >>
>> >>
> _______________________________________________________________________
>> >> Subscription information may be found at:
>> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>> >
>> >
>> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>> >
>> >
> _______________________________________________________________________
>> > Subscription information may be found
>> > at:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Windows Live Messenger. Multitasking at its finest.
> http://www.microsoft.com/india/windows/windowslive/messenger.aspx
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> So many new options, so little time. Windows Live Messenger.
> http://www.microsoft.com/india/windows/windowslive/messenger.aspx
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Apr 06 2009 - 06:44:06 ART