From: Ruhann (groupstudy@ru.co.za)
Date: Sun Mar 22 2009 - 09:53:49 ART
the seq number is just a numerical place holder for the entries of prefix
list "NET".
you wont be able to apply both lines on the same router as the first one
would get a default seq-number of 5 and the second line will shout at you,
something like "seq already exists"
then, x.x.x.x/x does not really equite to much in cisco land, so I cant
assist with the prefix difference between the two, but as for the length of
the subnet mask, yes there is difference.
the first command would allow subnet lengths from /24 up to /32 (host
routes) and the second only up to a length of 26 bits, depending on what the
magic /x value is.
hth :)
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 9:30 PM, Raghav Bhargava <raghavbhargava12@gmail.com
> wrote:
> hi Experts,
> What is the difference between these 2 commands:-
>
> ip prefix-list NET permit 1.1.1.1/8 ge 24 le 32
>
> AND
>
> ip prefix-list NET seq 5 permit x.x.x.x/x ge 24 le 26
>
> What is the significance of not using the sequence number in the first
> Command. Also is the first command correct. I doubt it???
>
> Please advise.
>
> --
> Warm Regards
> Raghav
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
-- <ruhann>Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Apr 06 2009 - 06:44:06 ART