Re: RIPv2 summany and more specific routes

From: Dale Shaw (dale.shaw@gmail.com)
Date: Fri Mar 20 2009 - 05:50:29 ART

Next message: Mink: "Re: Re: PIM Sparse Mode Very Basic Setup"
Previous message: Dale Shaw: "Re: RIPv2 summany and more specific routes"
Maybe in reply to: Mink: "RIPv2 summany and more specific routes"
Next in thread: Pavel Bykov: "Re: RIPv2 summany and more specific routes"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

D'oh! Scrap that. I spoke too soon. It worked for a moment, I promise:

10.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 5 subnets, 2 masks
R 10.3.1.0/24 [120/1] via 172.16.0.2, 00:00:05, FastEthernet0/0
R 10.2.1.0/24 [120/1] via 172.16.0.2, 00:00:10, FastEthernet0/0
R 10.1.1.0/24 [120/1] via 172.16.0.2, 00:00:15, FastEthernet0/0
R 10.0.0.0/14 [120/1] via 172.16.0.2, 00:00:22, FastEthernet0/0
R 10.0.1.0/24 [120/1] via 172.16.0.2, 00:00:21, FastEthernet0/0

Back to the ol' drawing board.

On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 7:48 PM, Dale Shaw <dale.shaw@gmail.com> wrote:
> OK, how about this?
>
> interface FastEthernet0/0
> ip address 172.16.0.2 255.255.255.0
> ip summary-address rip 10.0.0.0 255.252.0.0
> ip summary-address rip 10.0.1.0 255.255.255.0
> ip summary-address rip 10.1.1.0 255.255.255.0
> ip summary-address rip 10.2.1.0 255.255.255.0
> ip summary-address rip 10.3.1.0 255.255.255.0
>
> cheers,
> Dale

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net

Next message: Mink: "Re: Re: PIM Sparse Mode Very Basic Setup"
Previous message: Dale Shaw: "Re: RIPv2 summany and more specific routes"
Maybe in reply to: Mink: "RIPv2 summany and more specific routes"
Next in thread: Pavel Bykov: "Re: RIPv2 summany and more specific routes"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Apr 06 2009 - 06:44:06 ART