From: Radioactive Frog (pbhatkoti@gmail.com)
Date: Sun Mar 15 2009 - 03:56:02 ART
Haun and Thameem - thanks for your inputs.
Now it's clear to me :)
-frog
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 4:49 PM, Huan Pham <pnhuan@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Frog,
>
> There' no "connect" concept in VTP. Sw3 & sw4 do not have to "connect" to
> sw1 nor sw2. Donot confuse VTP server with stp root or others.
>
> Vtp server is the one that can make changes in VLAN database. Clients can
> only listen & update those changes.
>
> Sw3 & sw4 will take whatever updates made by ether sw1 or sw2, but cannot
> make any changes.
>
> Actually if sw1 makes a change (eg delete a VLAN), sw2 (and the 2 VTP
> clients of cause) also has to action that change as well.
>
> You can have all switches as servers, then they can all make changes, and
> they all have to listen & action changes made by others.
>
>
> Huan
>
> iTouched from iPhone ;)
>
> On 15/03/2009, at 1:47 PM, Radioactive Frog <pbhatkoti@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Guys,
> Just wondering what will happen when we have 2 VTP servers with the same
> vtp
> domain name in a single Broadcast domain?
>
> SW1---------Sw2
> | \ / |
> | \ / |
> | /\ |
> | / \ |
> Sw3-----------sw4
>
> SW1 and sW2 are VTP server with same domain name .i.e. CCIE
>
> SW3 and sW4 are configured as a VTP client for CCIE domain.
>
> How sw3 and sw4 decides which vtp server they need to connect?
>
>
> frog
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Apr 06 2009 - 06:44:05 ART