From: Nick (ccieaz@googlemail.com)
Date: Fri Mar 13 2009 - 09:14:06 ARST
Thanks for the reply all. I just wanted to confirm what i thought about
224.0.0.39, 40.
I think i was reading wrong information i found somewhere.
Nick
2009/3/13 Dale Shaw <dale.shaw@gmail.com>
> Hi Nick,
>
> As Daniel has already pointed out, the third octet for those groups is 1,
> not 0.
>
> 224.0.0.0/24 is reserved for local subnetwork control -- things like
> OSPF, EIGRP, RIPv2, and all that.
>
> I'm not sure how it's enforced, but theoretically everything using
> 224.0.0.0/24 should use a TTL of 1 -- you should never seen
> 224.0.0.0/24 groups leaking beyond the local link.
>
> cheers,
> Dale
>
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Nick <ccieaz@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I was making a quick list of well known multicast addresses and was
> confused
> > about these two, are 224.0.0.39 and 224.0.0.40 used for anything major ?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Nick
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Apr 06 2009 - 06:44:04 ART