From: NET HE (he_net@hotmail.com)
Date: Mon Mar 09 2009 - 23:22:00 ARST
You are using GigabitEthernet, how come the show policy-map interface tells
the bandwidth of the interface is 100M. For example, 70% x 100M = 70000k.
Best Regards,
Net (Xin) He
> To: karim.jamali@gmail.com
> CC: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: max-reserved-bandwidth
> From: rshummoo@ca.ibm.com
> Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 13:07:33 -0400
>
> Karim:
>
> The output shows 70 % of the 100%
>
>
> entral-GWY#sh policy-map interface gig0/0
> GigabitEthernet0/0
>
> Service-policy output: rambo
>
> Class-map: test1 (match-all)
> 0 packets, 0 bytes
> 5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
> Match: protocol rtp
> Queueing
> queue limit 64 packets
> (queue depth/total drops/no-buffer drops/flowdrops) 0/0/0/0
> (pkts output/bytes output) 0/0
> bandwidth 70% (70000 kbps)
> Fair-queue: per-flow queue limit 16
>
> Class-map: test2 (match-all)
> 0 packets, 0 bytes
> 5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
> Match: protocol snmp
> Queueing
> queue limit 64 packets
> (queue depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/0/0
> (pkts output/bytes output) 0/0
> bandwidth 10% (10000 kbps)
>
> Class-map: test3 (match-all)
> 0 packets, 0 bytes
> 5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
> Match: protocol citrix
> Queueing
> queue limit 64 packets
> (queue depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/0/0
> (pkts output/bytes output) 0/0
> bandwidth 15% (15000 kbps)
>
> Class-map: test4 (match-all)
> 0 packets, 0 bytes
> 5 minute offered rate 0 bps
> Match: protocol imap
>
> Class-map: class-default (match-any)
> 4101 packets, 378682 bytes
> 5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
> Match: any
>
>
>
>
>
> karim jamali <karim.jamali@gmail.com>
> 03/09/2009 12:51 PM
>
> To
> Cisco certification <ccielab@groupstudy.com>, Ram
> Shummoogum/Quebec/IBM@IBMCA
> cc
>
> Subject
> Re: max-reserved-bandwidth
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> The 75% maximum reserved bandwidth is still applicable. The reason you are
> not getting any problems with your configuration is that you are doing
> your reservations from the 75% (which is available) not from the total
> interface bandwidth i.e. 70% of the 75% of the interface bandwidth is what
> you are reserving.
>
> Regards,
>
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 7:42 PM, Ram Shummoogum <rshummoo@ca.ibm.com>
> wrote:
> Hi:
>
> I was just wandering if Cisco has changed their IOS so as not to take into
> account the 75 % maximum-reserved-bandwidth.
>
> I did not get any error/warning on the following config: I am running
> 12.4.22T. Any comments?
>
> class-map match-all test4
> match protocol imap
> class-map match-all test2
> match protocol snmp
> class-map match-all test3
> match protocol citrix
> class-map match-all test1
> match protocol rtp
> !
> !
> policy-map test
> policy-map rambo
> class test1
> bandwidth percent 70
> fair-queue
> class test2
> bandwidth percent 10
> class test3
> bandwidth percent 15
> class test4
> !
>
> interface GigabitEthernet0/0
> description Carrier
> ip address 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.0
> service-policy output rambo
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> KJ
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Apr 06 2009 - 06:44:04 ART