From: Edouard Zorrilla (ezorrilla@tsf.com.pe)
Date: Mon Mar 09 2009 - 10:03:12 ARST
I guess, If you do peer, both sides need it. May I right ?
Regards
----- Original Message -----
From: "GAURAV MADAN" <gauravmadan1177@gmail.com>
To: "Cisco certification" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 6:45 AM
Subject: NTP query
> Hi Friends
>
> I got this one wrong in one of my practice lab .
> Can someone clearify :
>
> R5(148.1.57.5) ====== (148.1.57.7)SW1 ====== BB3(204.12.1.254)
>
> R5 and SW1 shd get clock from BB3
> In case BB3 fails ; R5 and SW1 should be able to maintain consistency.
>
> My sol
> ----------
>
> R5 and SW1
> *******************
> ntp server 204.12.1.254
>
> R5
> ***********
> ntp peer 148.1.57.7
>
>
> Query
> I am confused abt the second statement ( In case BB3 fails ; R5 and SW1
> should be able to maintain consistency.)
>
> AM i supposed to add ntp master <> as well along with ntp peer <>
> statement
> on R5 . Peer is one which can accept as well as respond to updates
>
> PLease clearify this doubt of mine
>
> Gaurav Madan
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Apr 06 2009 - 06:44:04 ART