From: joe_astorino@comcast.net
Date: Wed Mar 04 2009 - 05:12:44 ARST
Good call NJ!!! Glad it is fixed Darrel.
----- Original Message -----
From: "sony darrel" <sonydarrel@gmail.com>
To: "ALL From_NJ" <all.from.nj@gmail.com>
Cc: "Nadeem Ansari" <nadeem.ansari574@gmail.com>, "Pavel Bykov" <slidersv@gmail.com>, "Cisco certification" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 4, 2009 1:25:26 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: OSPF metric issue
Hi Experts,
Problem solved when i removed max-metric router-lsa it is showing me the
exact cost,
thank u very very much all from_NJ, Joe and everybody who contribute to help
my problem solved.
Somebody configured in my absence this command.
Thanks,
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 9:04 AM, ALL From_NJ <all.from.nj@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sounds a little like you may have configured the max-metric router-lsa
> somewhere ...
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 12:10 PM, sony darrel <sonydarrel@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi Joe,
>>
>> Yes i did joe but no output.
>>
>> Auto-cost configured is 10000 MB
>>
>> Auto cost reference bandwith / interface bandwith is the metric
>> calculation.
>>
>> My interface bandwith is 1000 Mb
>>
>> i have entered 10000/1000 = 10 from router A to B the cost shld be 10 and
>> from the router B to C
>>
>> the cost shld be 10 but the route on router C is showing me 65545 instead
>> of
>> 20 why such ????
>>
>> Reply please,i m stuck
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 6:46 PM, Nadeem Ansari <nadeem.ansari574@gmail.com
>> >wrote:
>> - Show quoted text -
>>
>> > Yeah finally I done my calculation right:
>> >
>> > 1000000000/128000=7812 :)
>> > Regards
>> > Nadeem
>> > On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 8:07 PM, Pavel Bykov <slidersv@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Can you check bandwidth settings everywhere? On every interface in the
>> >> path?
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 11:51 AM, sony darrel <sonydarrel@gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Hi Experts,
>> >> > 10.1.1.2
>> >> > I have 3 routers 10.1.1.1 ----A--------B---------- C-10.3.3.3, am
>> >> running
>> >> > ospf on it,they all r connected through gigabit interface, i have
>> >> > configured
>> >> > auto-cost reference bandwith 10000
>> >> > MBps 10.3.3.2
>> >> >
>> >> > Because in future i will installed 10gig . Definately the cost is 10
>> as
>> >> > the
>> >> > interface is gigabit.But when i c in the sh ip route the metric for
>> >> network
>> >> > 10.1.1.1 is 65545,from where
>> >> >
>> >> > did it came can anybody help me.It is irritating me,
>> >> >
>> >> > when i c sh ip os interfce the cost what i c is 10 on all routers
>> but
>> >> when
>> >> > i c sh ip route the metric for network 10.1.1.1 is 110/65545
>> >> >
>> >> > the metric should be 20 ,the distance from A to B and from B to C????
>> >> > correct me if am wrong.
>> >> >
>> >> > this problem is strange for me.
>> >> >
>> >> > Awaiting for ur reply friends
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks,
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> >> > Subscription information may be found at:
>> >> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Pavel Bykov
>> >> ----------------
>> >> Don't forget to help stopping the braindumps, use of which reduces
>> value
>> >> of
>> >> your certifications. Sign the petition at
>> http://www.stopbraindumps.com/
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________________________________
>> >> Subscription information may be found at:
>> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Andrew Lee Lissitz
> all.from.nj@gmail.com
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Apr 06 2009 - 06:44:04 ART