From: Peter Svidler (doubleccie@yahoo.com)
Date: Tue Mar 03 2009 - 18:57:19 ARST
Hi Roman ,
what if the peering is not from the directly connected IP addressing but from
the loopbacks ?
--- On Tue, 3/3/09, Roman Rodichev <roman@iementor.com> wrote:
From: Roman Rodichev <roman@iementor.com>
Subject: RE: MPLS send-label
To: "'Peter Svidler'" <doubleccie@yahoo.com>, ccielab@groupstudy.com
Date: Tuesday, March 3, 2009, 3:54 PM
No you don't have to. The router that receives BGP routes with labels will
put them into the LFIB.
Roman Rodichev
5xCCIE #7927 (R&S, Security, Voice, Storage, Service Provider)
Instructor, Content Developer
ieMentor Corporation http://www.iementor.com
Y!M: roman7927
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Peter Svidler
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 2:50 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: MPLS send-label
Folks ,
just i want to confirm this , when i use the IPV4 send-label option between
two PE's running IPV4
even though the labels are send via BGP , it does not insall automatically
in
the MPLS table , i still need to redistribute BGP into IGP to get this the
prefixes installed in the MPLS forwarding table ..is this correct ?
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Apr 06 2009 - 06:44:03 ART