From: jockey wearer (jockeywearer@gmail.com)
Date: Tue Mar 03 2009 - 15:36:51 ARST
Thanks Pavel,
As I understood.
IF my company purchase some devices from Cisco .Did cisco gives us FAT
for any devices ? (Some Hardcopy document)
Thanks
Prashant
On 3/2/09, Pavel Bykov <slidersv@gmail.com> wrote:
> Well, SAT should be directly related to implementation project, meaning
> you're testing what you have implemented - redundancy, functionality,
> security, robustness, etc.
> In some cases, we also do tests on all devices before installing them -
> some
> configuration and some load for 24 hours. If it doesn't crash, then it can
> go into field. Test like that doesn't say much, but check for basic device
> operability. I think that would be your "FAT" tests.
>
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 8:42 AM, jockey wearer
> <jockeywearer@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Dear All,
>> Good -day!
>> I would like to know regarding FAT and SAT Testing .
>> We got the project for System Integration but I have small doubt
>> regarding
>> FAT/SAT as it is part of the Technical management .
>> As I know FAT is for factory acceptance test and SAT is site acceptance
>> test.
>> When We do this kind of tests ?
>> and what we need to check in that tests? as technical perspective.
>>
>> Any output is highly appereciative.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Prashant Sorte
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Pavel Bykov
> ----------------
> Don't forget to help stopping the braindumps, use of which reduces value of
> your certifications. Sign the petition at http://www.stopbraindumps.com/
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Apr 06 2009 - 06:44:03 ART