From: Nadeem Ansari (nadeem.ansari574@gmail.com)
Date: Tue Mar 03 2009 - 09:45:10 ARST
The question is wether you are advertising the vpnv4 prefixes via MBGP
sessions and also ensure that you are importing prefixes in VRF with correct
route-target on PEs.
Also I had doubt that how you have configured your P router means how can it
have route-target filter and VRF, as MPLS VPN's P router does not contains
any VRFs it just do MPLS switching based on lablels associated to PE routers
Also it will be more helpfull if you can provide configuration of
PE1--P--PE2 routers
Regards
Nadeem
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Peter Svidler <doubleccie@yahoo.com> wrote:
> folks,
> I have simple setup of 3 routers of a service provider, 2 PE's and 1 P
> router
>
> on the PE's there is one VRF created and receiving some prefixes from CEs
>
> when i establish the VPNv4 session inside the provider network , the
> prefixes
> appears in the MPLS table with [v] which means it is inisde the VRF and
> that
> is ok .
>
> my question is , why the other end prefixes does not appear on the PE ?
>
> also when i disable the route-target filter option on the P router , the
> VPN
> prefixes of both PE's appears in the MPLS table ...shoud not it remain in
> the
> vpnv4 table only ??
>
>
> thanks
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Apr 06 2009 - 06:44:03 ART