Re: Subnet masks creating additional interfaces, just for

From: Pavel Bykov (slidersv@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Mar 02 2009 - 13:22:19 ARST


Yes, all (although there are exceptions) IPs are given including masks. So
point will be removed if you do not follow documentation properly.

On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 7:37 PM, <ron.wilkerson@gmail.com> wrote:

> Your concern isn't up for discussion as you'll configure the ip's as
> instructed. There's no ambiguity about this.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rob Clav <robclav@gmail.com>
>
> Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 17:35:38
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com<ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Subject: Subnet masks creating additional interfaces, just for
> clarification.
>
>
> Hi,
> reading most of the preparations labs, you realize that they create
> Loopbacks interfaces using /24 subnet mask, but from my point of
> view, if you need to create them, and because the loopback interface
> is not connection oriented, you will be closer to the "passing" score
> using host subnet mask (/32), isn't?
> In the same way, if you are asked to use a tunnel interface, new
> addresses will be created using /24 mask? or /30 because there's a
> kind of network just for two peers?
>
> Cheers,
> Roberto Clavero
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
Pavel Bykov
----------------
Don't forget to help stopping the braindumps, use of which reduces value of
your certifications. Sign the petition at http://www.stopbraindumps.com/

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Apr 06 2009 - 06:44:03 ART