From: Daniel Kutchin (daniel@kutchin.com)
Date: Fri Feb 27 2009 - 07:18:36 ARST
Naveen -
For VTP information to be propagated by SW4,
following conditions should be met:
1. Domain names must match on all Switches
2. Disable Pruning on SW4 (not quite sure of this)
2. SW4 can be in Transparent mode
Debugging will be useful here: "debug sw-vlan vtp events"
Also view this Video (you need a CCO Account)
http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/473/vtp_flash/
-
Daniel
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
naveen M S
Sent: Freitag, 27. Februar 2009 09:08
To: Cisco certification
Subject: Re: VTP Issue
Folks,
Here is complete results of my experiments. Hope this benefits you.
SW1-------SW4--------SW2
X,Y,Z = Domain,Mode,Ver
Mode 'Any' = client or server or transparent
*Case-1)*
cisco,Server,2 -------- cisco,Any,2 --------- cisco,Client,2
*Result:*
Any vlan changes on SW1 is propogated to SW4 and SW2
Note that when both SW1 and SW4 are VTP servers, changes
on one server is updated by other server. Also, SW4 does't
update Vlan changes while in Transparent mode.
*Case-2)*
cisco,Server,2 -------- iewb,Any,2 ---------- cisco,Client,2
*Result:*
Any vlan changes on SW1 is NOT propogated to SW4 and SW2
*Case-3)*
cisco,Server,1 -------- cisco,Any,1 --------- cisco,Client,1
*Result:*
Any vlan changes on SW1 is propogated to SW4 and SW2
Note that when both SW1 and SW4 are VTP servers, changes
on one server is updated by other server. Also, SW4 does't
update Vlan changes while in Transparent mode.
*Case-4)*
cisco,Server,2 -------- iewb,Any,2 ---------- cisco,Client,2
*Result:*
Any vlan changes on SW1 is NOT propogated to SW4 and SW2
What bothers me is that how to get VTP updates from SW1 to SW2 ?
My task doesn't allow me to do Q-in-Q or L2protocol tunnelling.
All ideas are welcome.
Naveen.
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 11:05 PM, naveen M S <navin.ms@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes. This is VTP version 2.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 10:58 PM, joshua atterbury <
> joshuaatterbury@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> are you using vtp version 2?
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 5:55 PM, naveen M S <navin.ms@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Folks,
>>>
>>> Here is my scenario. Seems trivial but can't get it to work.
>>>
>>> SW1-------SW4-------SW2
>>>
>>> SW1 : VTP domain = cisco, Mode = server
>>> SW2 : VTP domain = cisco, Mode = client
>>> SW4 : VTP domain = iewb, Mode = server
>>>
>>> The 802.1q trunk links are established b/n the 3 switches and vlan 1 is
>>> native on them.
>>>
>>> Changes to vlan in SW1 are NOT propogated to SW2. What could be the
>>> problem
>>> ?
>>>
>>> *SW1:*
>>> interface GigabitEthernet1/0/20
>>> switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
>>> switchport mode trunk
>>> switchport nonegotiate
>>>
>>> *SW4:*
>>> interface GigabitEthernet1/0/14
>>> switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
>>> switchport mode trunk
>>> switchport nonegotiate
>>> !
>>> interface GigabitEthernet1/0/16
>>> switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
>>> switchport mode trunk
>>> switchport nonegotiate
>>>
>>> *SW2:*
>>> interface GigabitEthernet1/0/19
>>> switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
>>> switchport mode trunk
>>> switchport nonegotiate
>>>
>>> Rack1SW1# sh int trunk
>>>
>>> Port Mode Encapsulation Status Native vlan
>>> Gi1/0/20 on 802.1q trunking 1
>>>
>>> Rack1SW4# show int trunk
>>>
>>> Port Mode Encapsulation Status Native vlan
>>> Gi1/0/14 on 802.1q trunking 1
>>> Gi1/0/16 on 802.1q trunking 1
>>>
>>> Rack1SW2# sh int trunk
>>>
>>> Port Mode Encapsulation Status Native vlan
>>> Gi1/0/19 on 802.1q trunking 1
>>>
>>>
>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Mar 01 2009 - 09:44:13 ARST