From: Roger RPF (rpf@bluemail.ch)
Date: Tue Feb 24 2009 - 11:45:19 ARST
That's right Marko, in the aggregation of DSL connections, ATM is still widely used and works great. If you donbt consider the initial cost's....still a good technology for legacy DSL with limited BW services...
regards
Roger
-----UrsprC<ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] Im Auftrag von Marko Milivojevic
Gesendet: Dienstag, 24. Februar 2009 01:20
An: Alex H. Ryu
Cc: ALL From_NJ; swm@emanon.com; Service Provider; Cisco certification; Cisco certification
Betreff: Re: Cell Mode MPLS+LDP
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 17:43, Alex H. Ryu <r.hyunseog@ieee.org> wrote:
> Do we have Cell-mode MPLS in production in any where?
> I saw cell-mode MPLS was supported from Cisco BPX/MGX.
> But if you plan to use it with router platform, you have to use
> frame-mode MPLS.
>
> So I thought cell-mode MPLS was not advanced to production at all.
I'm glad you asked this.
If by "in-production" you consider one connection when I was bored and
boss wasn't looking, then, yeah, there is at least one out there ;-)
> The reason of deploying MPLS is to get rid of ATM or other underlying
> mechanism.
However, you would be surprised if you knew how much telcos still love
their ATM.
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Mar 01 2009 - 09:44:12 ARST