From: swm@emanon.com
Date: Mon Feb 23 2009 - 21:38:01 ARST
It just says "MPLS over ATM". *shrug* I wouldn't rule it out!
---- Message from ALL From_NJ <all.from.nj@gmail.com> at 2009-02-23 11:13:39
------
>Yep, that is my understanding too.
>
>BTW - I can not find the reference, but for the lab portion, I thought it was
only frame mode. No more cell mode I thought ...
>
>I checked the lab blueprint, but ... am not finding references to the modes.
>
>
>
>
>On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 11:09 AM, mailto:swm@emanon.com
<mailto:swm@emanon.com > wrote:
>
>
>Cell mode MPLS is a heavier burden on interfacing with the ATM network in
>order to use it's built-in features and intracacies. Your ATM switch will
>need to be configured and capable for this to work.
>
>With Frame Mode, you are essentially "not caring" about the underlying
>technology (be it frame, sonet, atm, ethernet, ppp, whatever) as long as you
>have reachability and communications already established.
>
>HTH,
>
>Scott
>
>
>---- Message from Service Provider <mailto:service.providersa@gmail.com > at
>2009-02-23 17:39:14 ------
>
>
>
>>Hi guys
>>
>>I was just doing a lab and realised that when configuring MPLS cell-mode,
no
>>IGP is necessary or required to establish the LDP neighborship like in
>>frame-mode MPLS. What causes this between cell-mode vs frame-mode?
>>
>>
>>Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>>_______________________________________________________________________
>>Subscription information may be found at:
>>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>--
>Andrew Lee Lissitz
>mailto:all.from.nj@gmail.com
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Mar 01 2009 - 09:44:12 ARST