From: Jared Scrivener (jscrivener@ipexpert.com)
Date: Sun Feb 22 2009 - 14:04:58 ARST
Correct. Hence why you'd never WANT to be using 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 in your
network statement as no interfaces would ever have an IP of 0.0.0.0.
The router just accommodates for your mistake and assumes you meant to type
0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255. It's helpful that way. :)
Cheers,
Jared Scrivener CCIE3 #16983 (R&S, Security, SP), CISSP
Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
Mailto: jscrivener@ipexpert.com
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Nadeem Ansari
Sent: Sunday, 22 February 2009 10:57 AM
To: Alexei Monastyrnyi
Cc: Rsharma; Cisco certification
Subject: Re: OSPF : Network Command 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
Actually wild card mask of 255.255.255.255 consists of all dont care bits,
means it will match all network addresses configured on interfaces :)
Regards
Nadeem
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Alexei Monastyrnyi
<alexeim73@gmail.com>wrote:
> Or you can just ask yourself which router interface would you addres with
> EXACT match 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 :-)
>
> A.
>
>
> Rsharma wrote:
>
>> Hi ,
>>
>> Just a small question .You might find it useless as well .but its bugging
>> me
>> .
>>
>> In OSPF,
>>
>> Network 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 area x
>>
>> while doing sh run | beg router ospf x
>>
>> running config show it as
>>
>> network 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 area x
>>
>> why it is showing like this ????
>>
>> *Rsharma*
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Mar 01 2009 - 09:44:12 ARST