From: NET HE (he_net@hotmail.com)
Date: Sat Feb 21 2009 - 00:38:45 ARST
Hobs,
I checked the command reference, "IP multicast boundary out " filtering PIM
joins and IGMP reports.
So I think if the first solution added with a keyword "out" should be good as
well.
Best Regards,
Net (Xin) He
> Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:52:39 -0700
> Subject: Re: access-group Vs multicast boundary in this case
> From: deadheadblues@gmail.com
> To: gauravmadan1177@gmail.com
> CC: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>
> Gaurav,
> IGMP solution looks right. Remember hosts use IGMP to join groups. I
believe
> multicast boundary is used to filter PIM joins from routers (as opposed to
> IGMP reports from hosts).
>
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 8:03 AM, GAURAV MADAN
<gauravmadan1177@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> > Hi All
> >
> > I have a case which says :
> >
> >
> > R4
> > | f0/0
> > |
> > CLIENTS
> >
> > These clients shd only recieve feeds for groups 225.25.25.25 and
> > 226.26.26.26
> >
> > I answered :
> >
> > Rack1R4(config-if)#do sh ip access-li
> > Standard IP access list 17
> > 10 permit 225.25.25.25
> > 20 permit 226.26.26.26
> >
> > int f0/0
> > ip multicast boundary 17
> > !
> >
> >
> > 2nd solution
> > ---------------------
> > Let these clients join these 2 grps only
> >
> > int f0/0
> > ip igmp access-grp 17
> > !
> >
> > Let me know if and why sol 1 is wrong ?
> >
> > Gaurav Madan
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Mar 01 2009 - 09:44:12 ARST