From: Hussam EL Kebbi (hussamkibbi@hotmail.com)
Date: Wed Feb 18 2009 - 09:37:06 ARST
Yes, single default towards HSRP Virtual IP. Any idea how exactly I can track
BGP session?
Is there benefit for HSRP here, as traffic is no more load balanced between
edge routers (As edge routers host internet table, so
have different AS path length for same destinations)
Thanks
> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 12:20:02 +0100
> From: alexeim73@gmail.com
> To: hussamkibbi@hotmail.com
> CC: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: BGP with HSRP failover!
>
> Hi Hussam.
>
> Behind your edge routers do you utilise a single default route towards
> HSRP virtual IP? Or is it more complicated?
>
> A.
>
> Hotmail wrote:
> > Hi Experts,
> >
> > How can I failover from R2 to R1 if EBGP session is down between R2 to
ISP2
> > and interface is still up.
> >
> > - 2 edge routers with different ISP each (hsrp), however I need the
> > "active" hsrp router (R2) to fail-over to R1 when R2 looses BGP adjacency
> > with ISP2.
> >
> > DIAGRAM:
> >
> > R1-------EBGP AS x-------ISP1
> > |
> > IBGP AS xxx
> > |
> > R2-------EBGP AS Y-------ISP2
> >
> > Thought about object tracking, but I don't know how much it can work with
> > it?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Hussam
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Mar 01 2009 - 09:44:11 ARST