From: Jared Scrivener (jscrivener@ipexpert.com)
Date: Tue Feb 17 2009 - 11:35:53 ARST
That's the way the RFC was written. It assumes EBGP peering will be done on
a directly connected physical link to a neighbor.
Cheers,
Jared Scrivener CCIE3 #16983 (R&S, Security, SP), CISSP
Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
Mailto: jscrivener@ipexpert.com
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Thameem Maranveetil Parambath
Sent: Tuesday, 17 February 2009 4:42 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Why is multihop only between ebgp neighbors and not ibgp ?
Hello all,
If the logic is the ttl should be made 2 for not directly connected
neighbors, why this applies only to ebgp neighbors?
Regards
Thameem
-----------------------------------------
The content of this email together with any attachments, statements
and opinions expressed herein contains information that is private
and confidential, are intended for the named addressee/s only. If
you are not the addressee of this email you may not copy, forward,
disclose or otherwise use it or any part of it in any form
whatsoever. If you have received this message in error, please
notify postmaster@etisalat.ae by email immediately and delete the
message without making any copies.
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Mar 01 2009 - 09:44:11 ARST