From: Kasper Adel (karim.adel@gmail.com)
Date: Fri Feb 13 2009 - 17:33:39 ARST
Thanks guys.
Would it be a safe practice to configure all the bgp neighbors in the exam
with next-hop-self, whether i/e-BGP or i/eMBGP
Regards,
Kas
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 12:40 AM, Shaughn Smith <
Shaughn.Smith@za.verizonbusiness.com> wrote:
> Roman answered the other questions very well, so will leave those alone.
>
>
>
> Answers inline.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 6) What could go wrong if i didnt configure bgp or ospf router-ID ? *For
> BGP and OSPF on the same router and both being in an "UP State" it is
> recommended that the Router-ID's that are configured are the same for both
> process's. Read RFC 1745 for more details. There are other reasons aswell.
I
> would check the documentation and Cisco's website for more info *
>
>
>
>
>
> 7) Could anything go wrong if i didnt configure passive-interface under RIP
>
>
> or any IGP for interfaces that will not receive routing info? *Only do
> this if they ask you to. You need to keep in mind any "future" changes in
> the network and how your commands will affect anything going forward. *
>
>
>
> 8) What type of problems could "ip pim dr-priority 0" solve in the exam
>
> other than the obvious (setting the priority)? *This command is used to
> set the priority for which a router is elected as the designated router*,
> *nothing else. I would assume they would normally tell you which router
> they want to be the DR ***
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Mar 01 2009 - 09:44:11 ARST