From: Jonah Dienye (jnhdny@gmail.com)
Date: Wed Feb 11 2009 - 13:54:43 ARST
Hi,
At a guess, I'd say it's because the documentation says "If any more
specific routes are
in the routing table, EIGRP will advertise the summary address out the
interface with a metric equal to
the minimum of all more specific routes." And that route isn't MORE
specific.
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Robin Betterley <ro.betterley@gmail.com>wrote:
> Folks,
> I was trying out and messing with the ip summary-address features for
> EIGRP.
> one of the guideline states that you need candidate route in the routing
> table in order for the summary to be advertise across the interface.
>
> Well, it works perfectly, so i try a different way, something like this,
>
> ip route 20.20.0.0 255.255.0.0 1.2.3.4
>
> router ei 1
> redis static metric 1500 etc
>
> interface s0/0
> ip sumary-address ei 1 20.20.0.0 255.255.0.0
>
> hmm didnt get what i expect, or maybe i had expected it, but i couldnt fine
> it anyway in the DOCdc that explained why it doesnt, in terms of specific
> requirements of the candidate route. Long story short, maybe someone can
> explain WHY this summary is not advertised?
>
> lastly, can someone make some sense why the AD for eigrp summary is only
> local significant? i mean the purpose of only locally significant. Thanks
> in
> advance.
>
> Robin
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
-- Jonah Dienye +2348068359414Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Mar 01 2009 - 09:44:10 ARST