From: Alexei Monastyrnyi (alexeim73@gmail.com)
Date: Tue Feb 10 2009 - 19:51:45 ARST
How about L2 VPNs? That would hide your infrastructure quite well.
A.
Ronnie Angello wrote:
> That would be more difficult as the provider must participate in
> customer routing. It sounds like you are more interested in an
> overlay design where you control all of your routing. I suppose you
> could NAT everything but that wouldn't scale well and would be a
> management nightmare. Maybe MPLS VPN isn't the right solution for
> your requirements...
>
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 4:26 PM, voice guru <guru.voice@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Steve,
>>
>> We already planned for it, but GET will not help us hiding the internal IP
>> Schema but yes it provides more security over the WAN.
>>
>> We must hide the IP Addresses from SP. any more Ideas.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Guru
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Mar 01 2009 - 09:44:10 ARST