From: Darby Weaver (ccie.weaver@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Feb 09 2009 - 06:51:48 ARST
Not impossible. I fear.
However, I personally believe that Cisco increases the number of live using
the N+1 method and the idea of how often they cycle the exams relative to
the life of a given series of exams...
It's all rumor... and hysteria.
But - I know you can get the same exam twice.
It's all relative.
Study the blueprint and just know it... no shorcuts on the job.
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 3:27 AM, Tony Schaffran (GS) <
groupstudy@cconlinelabs.com> wrote:
> I would say the odds are pretty low of getting the same exam twice.
>
> The best way to proceed is to study what you think you missed on the exam
> you last got, but do not forget to refresh topics that may have not been on
> your last exam because the odds of them showing up on your next have just
> increased.
>
> Good luck.
>
>
> Tony Schaffran
> Sr. Network Consultant
> CCIE #11071
> CCNP, CCNA, CCDA,
> NNCDS, NNCSS, CNE, MCSE
>
> www.cconlinelabs.com
> Your #1 choice for online Cisco rack rentals.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Kasper Adel
> Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2009 8:05 PM
> To: Cisco certification
> Subject: Repeated Exam
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> I hope my question doesnt break an NDA.
>
> I didnt make it in the first attempt and i am wondering what are the
> chances
> of me seeing the same exam i saw the first time in my second attempt?
>
> Thanks,
> Kas
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Mar 01 2009 - 09:44:10 ARST