From: Pavel Bykov (slidersv@gmail.com)
Date: Sat Feb 07 2009 - 17:38:42 ARST
Steve K, but what functionality are you achieving by this configuration?
What are you trying to accomplish?
On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 1:54 AM, <support@ccie.com.au> wrote:
>
>
> thanks for all your help people !
>
>
>
> i figured out the problem... and it all works now.. see below:
>
> *802.1Q/VLAN Usage*
>
> VLAN IDs on Catalyst 6500 and Cisco 7600 are global to the platform:
>
> * *A specific VLAN ID cannot be simultaneously configured on a Layer 3
> subinterface and on a VLAN
>
> interface (SVI).
>
> * *A specific VLAN ID cannot be re-used on multiple Layer 3 subinterface.
>
> In case one of the above combinations is attempted, the following error
> message is displayed on the
>
> router console:
>
> PE-7600-1#sho run int gig 7/1.10
>
> Building configuration...
>
> Current configuration : 106 bytes
>
> !
>
> interface GigabitEthernet7/1.10
>
> encapsulation d ot1Q 10
>
> end
>
> PE-7600-1#config t
>
> Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z.
>
> PE-7600-1(config)#vlan 10
>
> PE-7600-1(config-vlan)#no shut
>
> VLAN 10 is not shutdown.
>
> PE-7600-1(config-vlan)#end
>
> % Failed to create VLANs 10
>
> VLAN(s) not available in Port Manager.
>
> steve k
>
>
>
>
> ------- Original Message ------- On 2/6/2009 09:37 AM Joseph L. Brunner
> wrote:
> Wonderful post Pavel.. thank you too for that! Good show! :)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Pavel Bykov
> Sent: Friday, February 06, 2009 3:01 AM
> To: support@ccie.com.au
> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: HUGE STP VLAN problem
>
> Hello.
> After consulting with the colleague, here is the situation.
> What you are trying to do is called a MUXED UNI, required for EoMPLS
> (basically saving you money for ES20 linecard)
> How it is done is that you do a
>
> interface TenGigabitEthernet2/1
> switchport
> switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
> switchport trunk allowed vlan 100-200
> switchport mode trunk
>
> interface TenGigabitEthernet2/1.150
> encapsulation dot1Q 150
>
> So, don't forget allowed vlan list.
>
> BUT, this feature is available only in the latest SRC release, as far as I
> know.
> So if you are not configuring MUXED UNI for EoMPLS, do not configure this.
> Use vlans and trunks instead, because creating routed interface creates an
> internal vlan anyway.
>
> I.e.
> interface TenGigabitEthernet2/1.150
> encapsulation dot1Q 150
> ip add 10.0.150.1 255.255.255.0
> interface TenGigabitEthernet2/1.151
> encapsulation dot1Q 151
> ip add 10.0.151.1 255.255.255.0
>
> is exactly same as
>
> interface TenGigabitEthernet2/1
> switch mode trunk
> int vlan 150
> ip add 10.0.150.1 255.255.255.0
> int vlan 151
> ip add 10.0.151.1 255.255.255.0
>
> but first one will not work :)
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 8:41 AM, wrote:
>
> > Hello people,
> >
> > Ive been in a cold datacenter for the past 12hrs trying to resolve a
> > problem with our cat6509-e. the problem is very intersting and i have
> > never seen anything like it before. i have tryed everything that i know
> > but still no luck, so i resort to you guys for some help.
> >
> > the problem is:
> >
> > when trying to create a routed port "no switcport" then a sub-interface
> > "int g2/5.207" its all O.K, untill i enter the command encapsulation
> > dot1q.207" i get the error message "vlan 207 does not available" .... O.K
>
> > fine, when i go to create the vlan by entering conft# vlan 207 then name
> > it then exit, it says "VLAN(s) not available in Port Manager" !!
> >
> > so ive tryed changing the internal vlan usage allocation policy and
> > reload but still the same thing !! ive tryed just about anything but no
> > luck.. its b een 12 hrs now and i give up..
> >
> > the "sh spantree" command says "No spanning tree instance exists." !!!
> > then when i do sh vlan i can see the vlan 207 is there and its active !!
> > what da !! ???
> >
> > any suggestions: ???? anyone seen this before on a cat6509 running
> > 12.2(18)SXF7 avanced_ip_services ..??
> >
> > ive searched all of cisco site and only found this(which did not help)
> >
> >
>
>
http://supportwiki.cisco.com/ViewWiki/index.php/The_Cisco_Catalyst_6000/6500_
>
Series_switch_receives_the_VLAN(s)_not_available_in_Port_Manager_error_messag
>
>
e_when_it_attempts_to_create_a_VLANex.php/The_Cisco_Catalyst_6000/6500_Series
_switch_receives_the_VLAN%28s%29_no
>
>
t_available_in_Port_Manager_error_message_when_it_attempts_to_create_a_VLAN>
>
> >
> > steve
> >
> > thanks
> >
> > Steve K
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Pavel Bykov
> ----------------
> Don't forget to help stopping the braindumps, use of which reduces value of
>
> your certifications. Sign the petition at http://www.stopbraindumps.com/
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
-- Pavel Bykov ---------------- Don't forget to help stopping the braindumps, use of which reduces value of your certifications. Sign the petition at http://www.stopbraindumps.com/Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Mar 01 2009 - 09:44:10 ARST