From: Ronnie Angello (ronnie.angello@gmail.com)
Date: Tue Feb 03 2009 - 16:07:44 ARST
The latter, it "reduces the unnecessary refreshing and flooding of
already known and unchanged information."
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Han Solo <emaillists@me.com> wrote:
> 3600 seconds = 1 hour , cisco's implementation of ospf has max-age of an lsa
> set to 3600 secoonds or 1 hour , so does "ip ospf flood-reduction" affect
> this 1 hour max-age or is it the "paranoid" flood of 30 minutes ?
>
>
> Han Solo
> May the force be with you
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found
> at:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
-- Ronald Angello CCIE #17846Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Mar 01 2009 - 09:44:09 ARST