From: Brad Ellis (brad@ccbootcamp.com)
Date: Sat Jan 31 2009 - 14:12:41 ARST
Fastlane does quite a bit with storage training. If you want a contact
person at Fastlane, let me know. They have spent a lot of money on
storage lab equipment.
thanks,
Brad Ellis
CCIE#5796 (R&S / Security)
CCSI# 30482
CEO / President
CCBOOTCAMP - A Cisco Learning Partner (CLP)
Email: brad@ccbootcamp.com
Toll Free: 877-654-2243
Direct: +1-702-968-5100 = Outside the USA
FAX: +1-702-446-8012
YES! We take Cisco Learning Credits!
Training And Remote Racks: http://www.ccbootcamp.com
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Darby Weaver
Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 7:04 AM
To: prateek reddy
Cc: Felix Nkansah; George Murage; testing testing123; Cisco
certification; Cisco certification
Subject: Re: Bootcamps and Vendors
You have to look a little deeper for the Storage Track and a little
wider.
Think vendors like Skyline, Global Knowledge, and Unitek.
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 6:57 AM, prateek reddy
<prateek.reddyk@gmail.com>wrote:
> But there is no Schedule for Storage on their website.
>
> On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Felix Nkansah <felixnkansah@gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > There is ONLY one Storage vendor (despite attempts by others).
> > It is IEMentor.
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 10:11 PM, prateek reddy <
> prateek.reddyk@gmail.com>wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> What about CCIE STORAGE! can anyone recommend one good vendor for
that?
> >>
> >> On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 3:09 AM, George Murage <gmurage@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> Often, i think the question of vendor workbooks is asked the other
way
> >>> round. too much focus is placed on so and so workbook. however, i
> >>> think the best materials are those whose teaching style matches
your
> >>> learning technique. All the vendors mentioned here are all good
but
> >>> what about you? how do you learn? do u prefer to do most of the
work
> >>> yourself or prefer a more defined step by step approach? Do you
prefer
> >>> digging into full scale labs or prefer going through the mini-labs
> >>> until you are confident enough with all the technologies?
> >>>
> >>> In my case, i used IE materials coz the numerous mini-labs helped
me
> >>> learn the technologies slowly and i'd try all different ways of
> >>> configuring something, say like L2L VPN before moving on to
something
> >>> else. Does this mean that IE workbook is better then IPX. No. But
> >>> because of my learning technique, i preferred IE. My choice had
more
> >>> to do with me, than the vendor. Bobby commented that he hated the
> >>> numerous mini-labs on IE workbook, and preferred the mock-labs on
IPX.
> >>> well, that is his style of learning, but is it yours? I found the
> >>> full-length labs very very demanding and quite frankly did not do
more
> >>> than 5 or so full-length labs but spent tons and tons of time
working
> >>> on the mini-labs and coming up with my own.
> >>>
> >>> i passed on my second attempt. i'm no genius but i think it is
> >>> important 4 u 2 stay true to yourself. don't adjust to a vendor,
pick
> >>> one that comes closest to your learning techniques.
> >>>
> >>> HTH
> >>>
> >>> George M
> >>>
> >>> On 1/30/09, Felix Nkansah <felixnkansah@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> > Hi,
> >>> >
> >>> > Go with COD from IEX and workbooks from IPX for the security
track.
> >>> > With IEX, one thing that continues to remain true is that their
CODs
> >>> don't
> >>> > disappoint (r&s, security, sp).
> >>> >
> >>> > Felix
> >>> >
> >>> > On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 4:23 PM, testing testing123
> >>> > <testing3.141@gmail.com>wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> >> so when who's security materials should i invest in ? who is
known
> >>> >> for their security materials ? who does security the best ?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >>>
> >>>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Mar 01 2009 - 09:43:40 ARST