From: Jason Madsen (madsen.jason@gmail.com)
Date: Wed Jan 28 2009 - 19:36:43 ARST
you're welcome...hope it was what you were looking for.
Jason
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Sharma, Praveen <
Praveen.Sharma@spansion.com> wrote:
> Thanks Jason,
>
>
>
> I tested it with and without ip unreachable.
>
>
>
> It is working the same way as you have explained below.
>
>
>
> Praveen
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *From:* Jason Madsen [mailto:madsen.jason@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 28, 2009 1:29 PM
> *To:* Sharma, Praveen
> *Cc:* ccielab@groupstudy.com
> *Subject:* Re: IEWB Lab13 Vol 2 - Task 7.1
>
>
>
> ...by using "no ip unreachables" attempted pings (for example) would just
> time out, rather than respond with U.U.U.U. the user wouldn't know if the
> address doesn't exist or else exists and is filtered by ACL etc.
>
>
>
> Jason
>
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Jason Madsen <madsen.jason@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> haven't seen that lab, but it sounds like using "no ip unreachables". if
> icmp is denied by an ACL, people may get U.U.U.U otherwise.
>
>
>
> Jason
>
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Sharma, Praveen <
> Praveen.Sharma@spansion.com> wrote:
>
> Hi GS,
>
> I got confused with this statement in access-list example
>
> "Silently Discard packet that denied".
>
>
> To be more specific it is Vol II 4.1 Lab 13 7.1.
>
> Thanks
> Praveen
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Mar 01 2009 - 09:43:40 ARST