From: Pavel Bykov (slidersv@gmail.com)
Date: Tue Jan 27 2009 - 04:17:14 ARST
Marko, point me to one place, where there is an official positive reference
to braindumps on CLN.
What you are saying is just not true:
https://cisco.hosted.jivesoftware.com/message/10129#10129
https://cisco.hosted.jivesoftware.com/message/12440#12440
https://cisco.hosted.jivesoftware.com/message/12255#12255
Response of one of the CLN moderators:
Braindump sources are NOT allowed. The use of such materials is considered
as cheating and a way of devaluing Cisco certifications.
So no, TK/P4S is not recommended on CLN.
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Marko Milivojevic <markom@markom.info>wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 05:45, Brad Ellis <brad@ccbootcamp.com> wrote:
> > Narbik,
> >
> > I agree with you. The whole TK, P4S, reallabs.net, etc, thing is out of
> > control. Microsoft has been very active in going after companies who
> > degrade the value of their certifications. I don't quite understand why
> > Cisco does do the same thing. I know they have some new initiatives with
> > regards to their test integrity, so I wouldn't be surprised if we see
> > some changes on the horizon.
>
>
> What is confusing is that, according to what I've seen on CLN, Cisco
> is actually *recommending* P4S and TK as valid resources for exam
> preparation.
>
> However, with the whole removing of routing from CCNP (no more BSCI,
> it appears), I'm surprised they don't simply award CCxP to everyone
> who applies.
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
-- Pavel Bykov ---------------- Don't forget to help stopping the braindumps, use of which reduces value of your certifications. Sign the petition at http://www.stopbraindumps.com/Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Mar 01 2009 - 09:43:40 ARST