Re: whats wrong in this switch QoS

From: Wouter Prins (wp@null0.nl)
Date: Sat Jan 24 2009 - 11:54:15 ARST

• Next message: mreiks: "Re: Access-list rate-limit mask"
• Previous message: Wouter Prins: "Re: Hack Simplifies Cisco Router Attack -"
• Maybe in reply to: GAURAV MADAN: "whats wrong in this switch QoS"
• Next in thread: Hobbs: "Re: whats wrong in this switch QoS"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Gaurav,

I had about the same issue with a 3560 (dont know what you are using),
somewhere the doccd says that the parent policy can have only one match
statement, if you need more you need to create child maps.
I used to have this in the parent:

'match input-interface fa 0/1'
'match input-interface fa 0/2'
'match input-interface fa 0/3'

This was not allowed while:

'match input-interface fa 0/1 - 3' was allowed

Great? :>

2009/1/24 GAURAV MADAN <gauravmadan1177@gmail.com>

> Rack1SW1(config-if)#do sh class-map
> Class Map match-any DROPPED (id 1)
> Match ip dscp ef (46)
> Match ip dscp cs5 (40)
>
> Rack1SW1(config-if)#do sh policy-map
> Policy Map DROPPED
> Class DROPPED
> police 1000000 15625 exceed-action drop
>
>
> Rack1SW1(config-if)#do sh run int f1/0/11
> Building configuration...
> Current configuration : 124 bytes
> !
> interface FastEthernet1/0/11
> switchport access vlan 27
> switchport mode access
> storm-control broadcast level 15.00
> end
>
> Rack1SW1(config-if)#int f1/0/11
> Rack1SW1(config-if)#ser
> Rack1SW1(config-if)#service-policy in DROPPED
> Rack1SW1(config-if)#
> Apr 21 12:43:06.044: %QOSMGR-4-CLASS_NOT_SUPPORTED: Classification is not
> supported in classmap DROPPED
> Apr 21 12:43:06.044: %QOSMGR-4-CLASS_NOT_SUPPORTED: Classification is not
> supported in classmap DROPPED
> Apr 21 12:43:06.044: %QOSMGR-4-CLASS_NOT_SUPPORTED: Classification is not
> supported in classmap DROPPED
> Apr 21 12:43:06.044: %QOSMGR-4-CLASS_NOT_SUPPORTED: Classification is not
> supported in classmap DROPPED
> Apr 21 12:43:06.044: %QOSMGR-4-CLASS_NOT_SUPPORTED: Classification is not
> supported in cl
> Rack1SW1(config-if)#assmap DROPPED
> Apr 21 12:43:06.044: %QOSMGR-4-CLASS_NOT_SUPPORTED: Classification is not
> supported in classmap DROPPED
> Apr 21 12:43:06.044: %QOSMGR-4-CLASS_NOT_SUPPORTED: Classification is not
> supported in classmap DROPPED
> Apr 21 12:43:06.044: %QOSMGR-4-CLASS_NOT_SUPPORTED: Classification is not
> supported in classmap DROPPED
> Apr 21 12:43:06.044: %QOSMGR-4-CLASS_NOT_SUPPORTED: Classification is not
> supported in classmap DROPPED
> Apr 21 12:43:06.044: %QOSMGR-4-CLASS_NOT_SUPPORTED: Classification is not s
> Rack1SW1(config-if)#upported in classmap DROPPED
> Apr 21 12:43:06.044: %QOSMGR-4-CLASS_NOT_SUPPORTED: Classification is not
> supported in classmap DROPPED
> Apr 21 12:43:06.044: %QOSMGR-4-CLASS_NOT_SUPPORTED: Classification is not
> supported in classmap DROPPED
> Apr 21 12:43:06.052: %QOSMGR-4-CLASS_NOT_SUPPORTED: Classification is not
> supported in classmap DROPPED
> Apr 21 12:43:06.052: %QOSMGR-4-CLASS_NOT_SUPPORTED: Classification is not
> supported in classmap DROPPED
> Rack1SW1(config-if)#
>
>
> Please advice
>
> Gaurav Madan
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net

• Next message: mreiks: "Re: Access-list rate-limit mask"
• Previous message: Wouter Prins: "Re: Hack Simplifies Cisco Router Attack -"
• Maybe in reply to: GAURAV MADAN: "whats wrong in this switch QoS"
• Next in thread: Hobbs: "Re: whats wrong in this switch QoS"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Mar 01 2009 - 09:43:39 ARST