From: Tyson Scott (tscott@ipexpert.com)
Date: Sat Jan 24 2009 - 02:41:41 ARST
Tien,
Apply PAT at the VRF to global transition. If it needs to be two way
communication between customers then you would need to do static NAT if you
have overlapping address space.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/ipaddr/configuration/guide/iadnat_mpls_v
pns_ps6441_TSD_Products_Configuration_Guide_Chapter.html
Regards,
Tyson Scott - CCIE #13513 R&S and Security
Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Cell: +1.248.504.7309
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
Mailto: tscott@ipexpert.com
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Tien
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2009 10:08 PM
To: CCIE Lab
Subject: another mpls route leaking question
Hi GS,
When doing route leaking from vrf to global and back, we need to have the
vrf route in the global table, this so the return traffic from the global
now how to get to the vrf.
Ok, the questons I have:
so what happend if i have to overlapping customer who has the same subnet?
Is it the best practice to route the customer vrf route in the global route
table?(SP CORE)
Thanks for the help
Tien
Sample config:
ip route 10.15.53.0 255.255.255.0 Serial2/0
ip route vrf MAIN 125.70.0.0 255.255.255.0 FastEthernet0/0 125.50.23.2
global
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Mar 01 2009 - 09:43:39 ARST