Re: dot1Q Tunnel

From: Syed Ali (testcricket@gmail.com)
Date: Fri Jan 23 2009 - 09:48:39 ARST


Thanks a lot Scott

On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 4:27 AM, Scott Morris <
smorris@internetworkexpert.com> wrote:

> It's not so much that it helps to create a q-in-q tunnel, but it helps
> differentiate things on the service provider's network such that everything
> gets a double tag. Keeps client traffic separated. Therefore keeps the
> world a little more sane! Untagged traffic may be
> interpreted/routed/intercepted locally instead of forwarded on the tunneled
> path.
>
> HTH,
>
> Scott
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Syed
> Ali
> Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 6:52 PM
> To: Cisco certification
> Subject: dot1Q Tunnel
>
> H experts,
> How does the tagging of native vlan help to create a dot1q
> tunnel when we are not allowed to assign the access vlan (e.g. sw acc vlan
> 5). Can someone explain please?
>
> thanks
> Syed
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Mar 01 2009 - 09:43:39 ARST