RE: Policing or Shaping

From: NET HE (he_net@hotmail.com)
Date: Tue Jan 20 2009 - 00:12:15 ARST


Since the condition is 70% utilization of bandwidth, in other words, there is
no congestion. So congestion management of using queues can't be used. And
congestion avoidance works on queues instead of bandwidth utilization, so
congestion avoidance is not an option either.

Traffic shaping can't set bits to inform other network nodes, so it is
excluded.

Traffic policing can set bits based on bandwidth utilization, but the bits are
to inform downstream network instead of upstream network. Best Regards, Net
(Xin) He > Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 19:32:16 +0400> Subject: Re: Policing or
Shaping> From: ccie.tobe81@gmail.com> To: sadiqtanko@gmail.com> CC:
slidersv@gmail.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com> > Hi,> > Local router needs to
inform remote router that network is congested and> remote router needs to
slow down packet forwarding once traffic utilization> on FR interface of local
router will reach 75%. Don't use FECN or BECN.> > > HTH> > On Mon, Jan 19,
2009 at 7:16 PM, Sadiq Yakasai <sadiqtanko@gmail.com> wrote:> > > Well, cos of
"and we need to inform remote router that there is congestion> > in network.",
I would tend to think we need to inform the remote router that> > there is
congestion on the network, so that an immediate action would be> > taken.> >>
> I think there isnt enough information from the question to provide an> >
exactly solution.> >> > Anyways, just my 2 cents.> >> > Sadiq> > > Blogs and
organic groups at http://www.ccie.net> >



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Mar 01 2009 - 09:43:39 ARST